QRZ! Ham Radio 5/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 5.iso/digests/infoham/940806.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-11-13 | 10.1 KB

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 94 04:30:10 PDT
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #806
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Mon, 18 Jul 94       Volume 94 : Issue  806

Today's Topics:
               Can you identify this call sign? - 'NMN'
                          IC229H Mods Wanted
                          ICW2A Mods Wanted
                Letter to Washington about FCC delays
                   Need help with equip suggestons
                              supermorse
                          VE3ONT info missed

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 1994 05:39:39 GMT
From: news.Hawaii.Edu!kahuna![e-mail]
Subject: Can you identify this call sign? - 'NMN'
To: [e-mail]

In article <30coje$[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mike Stramba) writes:
>This morning at around 3:00 a.m. e.d.t, I heard on 12.71xx MHZ:
>   cq cq cq de nmn nmn nmn qru? k
>Any idea of who/what 'nmn' is? .. or where I could find out?
>I tried the callsign server at electra.cs.buffalo.edu, but got
>'no references'.

That's US Coast Guard Radio Station Portsmouth, VA; I wouldn't
suggest that you answer their CQ, though ;).  What you heard  was
their CQ tape fishing for some traffic; they'll take WX, position
reports, and medical traffic, but no commercial traffic, from
any ships and boats.

If you're near a library that contains a government documents
depository look for publications such as WORLDWIDE MARINE WEATHER
BROADCASTS to connect callsigns you hear with the various shore
stations.

You'll hear NMN and others on 4,6,8,12,16, and 22 MHz; good code
practice when they send the WX and Notice To Mariner broadcasts
(code speed is 16-18 wpm).

Jeff NH6IL (ex NMO/Honolulu and NMC6/Monterey employee)

------------------------------

Date: 18 Jul 1994 00:11:03 -0400
From: newstf01.cr1.aol.com!search01.news.aol.com![e-mail]
Subject: IC229H Mods Wanted
To: [e-mail]

Does anyone have a list of mods for the ICOM IC229H 2 meter mobile radio?
I read somewhere that it can be modified for Aircraft Rx - does anyone
have that mod?  Please e-mail me anything you have as I don't have ftp
capability yet.

Thanks in advance,

Warren Whitby
[e-mail]
73s de KE4ITL

------------------------------

Date: 18 Jul 1994 00:09:04 -0400
From: newstf01.cr1.aol.com!search01.news.aol.com![e-mail]
Subject: ICW2A Mods Wanted
To: [e-mail]

Does anyone have a lists of mods for the ICW2A HT?  Please e-mail me
anything you have as I don't yet have ftp capability.

Thanks in advance,

Warren Whitby
[e-mail]
73s de KE4ITL

------------------------------

Date: 17 Jul 94 20:19:09
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news.usafa.af.mil!usafa2![e-mail]
Subject: Letter to Washington about FCC delays
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Mickey McInnis) writes:

   In article <301c1d$[e-mail]>, Ira Machefsky ([e-mail]) writes:
   >If our congressional representatives cut the budget without forseeing this
   >difficulty, then they bungled, not the FCC. If the ARRL opposed license fees
   >(which I understand they did), then they bungled. No one is doing me a service
   >by saving me 10 bucks and making me wait 17 weeks.
   >....

   NO! NO! NO!

   Fees for Amateur Radio licenses are a very bad idea.  We get use of the
   frequencies and licenses at no charge because we provide a public service.

(snip!)

   Look at it this way.  The FCC apparently has one person fulltime
   providing license processing.  There are probably tens of thousands of
   government employees working fulltime providing communications services
   that work less well than the amateur radio service.  If ten more FCC
   employees were devoted to license processing, that would break the
   backlog almost immediately.  If a few dozen more FCC employees were
   dedicated to hunting down bootleggers, and handing out $10,000 fines,
   that would help a lot.  (Bootlegger hunting could probably be made to
   pay for itself if Congress would allow it to do so.) At a total
   additional cost of less than 1 more FCC person per state, great
   improvement to emergency communications could be attained.
   --
   Mickey McInnis - [e-mail] ([e-mail] outside IBM)
   --

Hmm...that gives me an idea.  Someone (yeah, I know) posted a statement saying
that the FCC could not accept the services of volunteers to do the necessary
data entry.  I wonder, however, if there is any such restriction on accepting
help from *other government agencies*.  For the cost of a plane ticket and
a few days per diem cost, I (or any other Executive Branch employee) could go
help them out -- assuming I could get the time off here, of course :-).  Maybe
a quick grep on the Elmer list would turn up a few names coming from .gov or
.mil sites....

73,
Jeff   NH6ZW/N0  AFA5MJ/AFF5CO
--
Jeff Miller,  NH6ZW/N0,  AFA5MJ/AFF5CO   (ex WD6CQV, AFA1DO, AFA8JM, AFA1HE)
USAFAnet Manager and General Troubleshooter [[e-mail]] or
HQ USAF/DFYC, USAF Academy, CO 80840      [[e-mail]]
55: It's not a good idea, it's just the law.  E-mail for NMA info.

------------------------------

Date: 17 Jul 1994 23:18:13 -0400
From: europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!news.cc.emory.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Need help with equip suggestons
To: [e-mail]

Greetings!  I am soon to be a new ham ( I have been studying diligently
and realize that "soon" is a relative term in regards to the current
delay with the FCC) and I have several questions in regard to what
equipment to buy or not to buy.

First let me say that if this is the wrong group I apologize.  I searched
pretty thoroughly, but my site does not get all of the groups.  Second, I
have some pretty unusual circumstances, so a brief description is
necessary.

I live in San Diego, and am purchasing a radio so that I will be able to
communicate with my Father who will be on a boat in the South Atlantic for
about a year.  He is not a Ham, but he will have a Marine SSB radio which
operates in the HF frequencies.  The radio I purchase must be a Marine
radio, licensed as a shore station in order for he and I to have a two-way
conversation.  (His radio picks up 0.5-30MHz, but I quickly discovered that
"cross-banding" is a bozo no-no.)  I have always been interested in Ham
radio, so if I am going to go to all of the expense of setting the thing
up I want to be able to use the Ham capabilities too.

After careful study I have decided on the SGC SG-2000.  This radio is type
accepted for Ham use, and all of the Marine radio people I have talked to
say that it is top of the line.  My questions are as follows:

1.  Does anyone have direct experience with this radio, or SGC in general?
2.  What are the features I should look for on a first class Ham rig?
3.  My father will have the capability to Rx and maybe Tx fax and/or
    RTTY.  What is the cheapest and/or easiest (I realize that the two are
    not nec. the same) way for me to add packet, RTTY, etc.?  I am also
    purchasing a computer, and I am curious about the "Internal" vs.
    "External" TNC's.  What are the advantages/disadvantages?
4.  I am also interested in v/uhf equipment.  I hear that the Kenwood
    79 is the best, but my budget will probably require starting with
    something used, any suggestions?

If you have read this far, I am already very grateful.  Any suggestions
you have in the above (or any other) areas would be greatly appreciated.
The best way to get me the info would be to E-mail it to me since I will
probably not get back to check this group in time to read a response
here.  My address is: [e-mail]

Also, any information from locals (San Diego County) about clubs,
repeaters, classes, etc. would be appreciated.

Once again many thanks, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Doug
:-)

------------------------------

Date: 17 Jul 94 21:25:43 +1700
From: dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uhog.mit.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!godot.cc.duq.edu!news.duke.edu!convex!bcm!newsfeed.rice.edu![e-mail]
Subject: supermorse
To: [e-mail]

Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu
Organization: Vanderbilt University
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 1994 14:42:44 GMT
Lines: 8


and [e-mail] (PFEIFFEM_1) comments...

Greg,
   Most any BBS has a copy of Supermorse.

------------------------------

Date: 18 Jul 1994 03:22:17 GMT
From: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu![e-mail]
Subject: VE3ONT info missed
To: [e-mail]

    Greetings.  My parents computer ate the announcement from the folks
at VE3ONT when I downloaded it (a mac, a mac, my kindom for a mac).  Anyways
if anyone still has it could they repost or email it to me.

Thanks in advance.
Michael  KD6PUD/AG
[e-mail]

--
Names....I got Lots of those....
Michael Douglas Polkinghorn / Michael the Bard / Galahad  / or Current Resident
[e-mail] / KD6PUD / BCSCR 736              "Witty Disclaimer"

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #806
******************************